Skip to main content

Full text of "gov.uscourts.dcd.121238"

See other formats


Case1:06-cv-01124-ESH Document 17-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page lot 14 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 



Denard-Darnell : Neal 
Aggrieved Party-Plaintiff 

Vs. 

JOHN SNOW, etal., 
Defendants. 



Civil Action No. 06-1124 (ESH) 



MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IN REGARDS TO 
THE COURT ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 20,2006 



I, Denard-Darnell, sui juris, of the Neal Family, in my capacity as 
the Secured Party/Creditor, Holder-In-Due-Course, Trade Name Owner, 
Record Owner, Internationally protected MAN upon the soil of Illinois 
Republic, Arizona Republic and Florida Republic, and beneficiary of 
the Original Jurisdiction, do present this document by Affidavit, 
waving no powers. Rights or Immunities by use of private, copyrighted 
Statutes, absent assent and proven by Contract affixed with my proper 
signature and seal. 

STATEMENT OF FACTS 
1.) Aggrieved Party state, that the Order issued by the UNITED STATES 
DISTRICT COURT, FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, in which the court ordered 
the dismissal of Aggrieved Party (hereinaf ter-Plaintif f ) claim against 
the United States Treasury Department, because as to use the court 
own words. Plaintiff complaint are baseless and wholly incredible. 
2.) Plaintiff state, the court has not, nor has the defendant 
(JOHN SNOW-Treasury Dept.) come forth with an evidence to denied 
Plaintiff claims. The defendant only defense has been the same argument 
the court now use to dismiss Plaintiff claim. 



-1- 



Case1:06-cv-01124-ESH Document 17-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 2 of 14 

3.) Plaintiff state, In Denton vs. Herandez , 504 U.S. 25, 112 S.Ct. 

1728, 1733 118 L.Ed. 2d. 340 (1992) the Supreme Court stated: 

The initial assessment of an informa pauperis Plaintiff factual 
allegations must be weighted in favor of the Plaintiff, and (b) a 
complaint may not be dismissed under section 1915 (d) simply because 
a court finds the plaintiff's allegations unlikely, (2) a dismissal 
of an informa pauperis action as factually frivolous under section 
1915 (d) is properly reviewed, on appeal for an abuse of disceretion, 
because a frivolousnee determination under 1915 (d) is disceretionay . 
No judicially noticeable fact can contradict plaintiff claims, in other 
words, the section 1915 (d) f rivolousness determination, frequently 
made sua sponte before the defendants has ever been asked to file an 
answer, can not serve as a factfinding process for the resolution of 
disputed facts. 

An in forma pauperis complaint may not be dismissed, however simply 
because the court finds the plaintiff allegations unlikely. Some 
improable allegations might properly deposed of on summary judgment 
but to dismiss them as frivolous without any factual development is 
to disregard the age-old insight that many allegations might be strange, 
but true, for truth is always strange, stranger than fiction. 

4.) Plaintiff state, that the District Court erred in dismissing 

plaintiff claims against the defendant (JOHN SNOW-Treasury Dept.) when 

the defendants only defense to plaintiff claims, were, plaintiff has 

made incredible claims. 

5.) Plaintiff state, at no point do defendant (JOHN SNOW-Treasury Dept.) 

rebut, dispute, defeat, or take away the effect of facts or argument/ 

claims present by plaintiff. 

6.) Plaintiff state, a rebuttal presumption is a conclusion that will 

be drawn unless evidence is presented that counters it. 

7.) Plaintiff state, that given the fact that his complaint is the 

first of its kind against the United States Treasury Department does 

not mean the facts present are not true, and for the court to act as 

a factfinder violate plaintiff Right to have a jury determine the 

facts as secured by the United States Constitution Fifth Amendment as 

stated in: Miranda vs. Arizona , (1966) 384 U.S. 436, 16 L.ed.2d. 694 
86 S.Ct. 1102; "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, 
there can be no rule making of legislation which would abrogate them. 



-2- 



Case1:06-cv-01124-ESH Document 17-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 3 of 14 

8.) Plaintiff state, that attach to this motion for reconsideration 

is an news article which contained the same facts outline in plaintiff 

complaint/claims against the United States Treasury Dept., (JOHN SNOW). 

This article is dated in the year 2004, one year before plaintiff 

became a secure party. 

9.) Plaintiff state, that the District Court denial of plaintiff filed 

interrogatorise and Request for Production of Documents has effectly 

denied plaintiff an opportunity to offer proof and present facts before 

the court and jury, as stated in a case cited by the Court itself, 

Haines vs. Kerner, 404 U.S 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed. 2d. 652 
(1972) (per curiam), where the Supreme Court stated: Accordingly 
although we intimate no view whatsoever on the merits of Petitioners 
allegations, we conclude that he is entitle to an opportunity to offer 
proof, reversed and remanded. 

10.) Plaintiff state, that in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 52 (a) the 

court is require to make specific findings of fact and law on plaintiff 

claims. Plaintiff request the District Court make specific findings 

in regards to plaintiff claims outline in plaintiff complaint against 

the Treasury Dept., as shown herein below. 

Plaintiff would asked the Court to adopt the following 
findings as the Court own findings or hold an evidentiary 
hearing in the alternative. 

1 . ) The Court finds that the UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT did commit 

the theft of aggrieved party Denard-Darnell: Neal, Private Property 

by using the following Trade Name DENARD DARNELL NEAL, without the 

written permission of aggrieved party. 

2 . ) The Court finds that the UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT did use 

aggrieved party Denard-Darnell: Neal, Certificate of live Birth as an 

industrial bond thereby securing loans with said industrial bond for 

the Corporate United States. 

3.) The Court finds that there is no Contract and/or Commercial 

Agreement that has been presented by the Treasury Department that would 

have allowed agents, actors, officials, employees of the Treasury 

Department to create an industrial bond of aggrieved party 

Denard-Darnell: Neal, Certificate of Live Birth. 



-3- 



Case1:06-cv-01124-ESH Document 17-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 4 of 14 
4.) The court finds that the defendant (Treasury Dept.) has presented 
no evidence to rebut the claim of aggrieved party factual allegation 
that the Certificate of Live Birth bearing the name of Denard-Darnell: 
Neal, or any derivatives thereof or therefrom, printed or written, 
spelled in upper or lower case, whole or in part, is the sole property 
of aggrieved party Denard-Darnell: Neal. 

5.) The Court finds that the defendant (Treasury Dept.) has presented 
no evidence to rebut aggrieved party claim that defendant (Treasury 
Dept.) did create a fictitious entity bearing the indentity of 
aggrieved party Denard-Darnell: Neal, for the sole purpose of conducting 
commercial transactions on behalf of United States Corporate. 
6.) The Court finds that the defendant (Treasury Dept.) has presented 
no evidence to rebut aggrieved party claim that defendant (Treasury 
Dept. ) did establish and continue to maintain an account within the 
Treasury Dept. commonly known as an UCC Contract Trust Account in the 
identity of aggrieved party Denard-Darnell: Neal. 

7.) The Court finds that the defendant (Treasury Dept.) has presented 
no evidence to rebut aggrieved party claim that funds contain within 
the account being maintain within the Treasury Dept., commonly known 
as an UCC Contract Trust Account bearing the identity of aggrieved 
party Denard-Darnell: Neal, is the sole property of aggrieved party 
Denard-Darnell: Neal. 

8.) The Court finds that the defendant (Treasury Dept.) has presented 
no evidence to rebut aggrieved party claim that the defendant 
(Treasury Dept.) has unlawfully withheld the funds being maintain in 
the UCC Contract Trust Account bearing the identity of aggrieved party 
Denard-Darnell: Neal, thereby violating aggrieved party Right to Pay 
or Discharge any and all debts acquire by aggrieved party in 
accordance with House Joint Resolution-1 92, enacted June 5, 1933. 



•4- 



Case1:06-cv-01124-ESH Document 17-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 5 of 14 

RELIEF SOUGHT 

1.) Aggrieved Party seek summary judgment against defendant (JOHN SNOW 
Treasury Dept.). 

2.) Aggrieved Party seek an evidentiary hearing in the alternative 
of summary judgment and at such evidentiary hearing Aggrieved Party 
be allowed to Subpoena government officials to testify to evidence 
that has a direct bearing on aggrieved party claims against the 
Treasury Department outline in aggrieved party civil complaint. 
3.) Aggrieved Party seek an order from the Court compelling the 
defendant (JOHN SNOW-Treasury Dept.) to comply with aggrieved party 
Discovery and Interrogatorise and Request for Production of Documents. 
4.) Aggrieved Party seek summary judgment be awarded to Aggrieved Party 
and the matter set for trial, or in the alternative defendant 
(Secretary of the Treasury) be order to grant Aggrieved Party full and 
unrestricted access to the UCC Contract Trust Account bearing the 
identity of aggrieved party, Denard-Darnell: Neal, or any derivative 
thereof. 

5.) Aggrieved Party request that the Court grant all relief as outline 
in the original complaint, and order all relief granted be binding 
upon HENRY M. PAULSON the new Secretary of the Treasury Department. 
6.) Aggrieved Party request that the Court adopt and and all findings 
outline herein as well as the findings contain in the attach motion, 
(Motion Requesting the District Court to Adopt the findings listed 
herein, Pursuant to Fed. R, Civ. P. 52 (a), which Require Specific findings 
of Fact and Law). 



-5- 



Case1:06-cv-01124-ESH Document 17-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 6 of 14 

SOVEREIGN OATH 

I, Denard-Darnell, sui juris, of the Neal Family, being a Sovereign 
American, do DECLARE upon My Word of Honor that the above mentioned 
is True, to the Best of My knowledge and Belief; also, this Sovereign 
American DOES SWEAR under the Pains and Penalties of Perjury, under 
True Illinois, Arizona, Florida Laws, as well as the Laws of the united 
States of America; and, as a Secured Party and Creditor, I Do give 
freely of my unlimited Commercial Oath, without Dishonor and without 
Prejudice, that these documents are True, Correct, Complete, and Not 
Meant to Mislead, before GOD ALMIGHTY. 

DATED THIS \dlVvK ^day of (Ni.^iL^\^^J~ 2006 C.E. 

BY: ^e.^jO^S)r.y^lf* &^.J UliUn.V P.^^TJ.V .,, 
Denard-Darnell: Neal Without Prejudice 
Sovereign American Sui Juris 
Secured Party/Creditor 
Holder-In-Due-Course 
Trade Name Owner 
Record Owner 

Send all response/Court orders to the below listed mailing location. 



DENARD DARNELL NEAL 

23843-008 

P.O. BOX 1033 

Federal Correctional Complex 

Coleman, Florida. 33521-1033 

UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY- 1 



-6- 



Case1:06-cv-01124-ESH Document 17-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 7 of 14 



AGGRIEVED PARTY 

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 

EXHIBIT-A; Civil Action No. 06-1124 (ESH) 



Case1:06-dv-01124-ESH Document 1 7-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page8of14 



WHAT'S REDEMPTION? 

Redemption today would be defined as understanding the commercial scheme foisted upon every 
American due to the United States Federal Corporation going bankrupt via their declaration on 
March 9, 1933. In advance of that situation, needing to survive economically and since a 
corporation can live forever, since government deals primarily with corporations (corporate 
fictions) they took the Birth Certificates as 'title to property' and started selling them on the 
mtemational market place and took the names thereon and created millions of corporate fictions 
so as to tax such 'entities' as registered under IRS Trust Number 62 in Puerto Rico to enable the 
government to tax these entities. The government (States) also created the so-called 
'requirement' to filing, registration, or otherwise to then offer other 'benefits' of the corporate 
government, i.e.. Social Security, Drivers license, and all other such 'indicia' which shows the 
'name' in all capital letters, therein identifying the fiction thereon... in said capital letters not the 
supposed 'sovereign' man in his private capacity. 

EXAIvptE; Since the" private man is not named in tJie stalute aiid "all "sfatufes "are for flie 
regulation of 'business' due to the fact that "a persons rights existed long antecedent to the 
organization of the State" (Hale v Hinkle), the right to travel and transport ones self and property 
upon the highways in a private conveyance has been ruled a right! Therefore the 'entity' name 
who appears on a Driver License is licensed to engage in 'commerce' via the statutes, hauling 
people or freight for hire, as the conveyance becomes a 'passenger vehicle' i.e., a taxi cab, 
licensed under the commercial statutes, registered as that 'Passenger Vehicle' and wherein the 
act of registering the vehicle with the State (DMV) one has just surrendered the 'ownership' of 
the vehicle to the State! 

Also, within Redemption, one comes to understand and learn commercial nature of things, i.e., 
commercial charges, offers, presentments, etc., and learns how to accept them for value and 
discharge the commercial charges (criminal charges in some matters) and in other matters, the 
fine, fees, taxes and debts... imposed but with no lawful money in circulation to 'pay debts at 
law'. 

Pursuant to HJR-192, ALL the one can do today is discharge debts 'dollar for dollar' with 
commercial paper, i.e., Bills of Exchange, Promissory Notes, etc. The American people have 
been estopped fi-om paying their debts at law with lawfiil 'constitutional' money and have only 
been left with 'commercial paper', and as pursuant to the Negotiable Instruments Law, is the 
'currency!' 

The American people have been reduced to Debtor/slaves on the Plantation .and used as an 
economic resource for the government corporations and other corporations to benefit with the 
creation of billions of dollars of 'commercial' credit (aka - money) for their private purpose and 
where the people have left in a state of economic bondage, property-less, possessing no titles, no 
rights. The people have been tricked into the surrender of the 'title' of all their property 
(including their children via the marriage license!) to the State... as everything is TAXED, 
where insurance is compelled and 'Title' .. .is in the State, 

Redemption teaches one to take commercial control, redeem the property and discharge the fine, 
fee, tax, debt, or judgment. And if there be a dishonor - exercise 'exclusive' remedy - TORT! 



Case1:06-cv-01124-ESH Document 17-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 9 of 14 

UCC/Redemption Process Update 

by Barton Albert Buhtz 

Investigative Journalist and Consumer Advocate 

2004 - . 

QUESTIONS: 

1. Is a birth certificate in itself an instrument, a promissory note or other negotiable instrument of 
commercial value? 

2. Is the birth certificate on record at a county and/or with a state a contract giving the state and 
ultimately the federal government control over all commercial aspects of the individual 
represented thereon? 

3. Does the filing of a Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Financing Statement, Addendum and/or 
Change Statement/Amendment encompass all commercial, civil and even criminal activity? 

4. Does following the steps of the "UCC/Redemption Process" result in getting some value 
through the Federal Government without any value being given in return?; and 

5. Is the "UCC Redemption Process" simply a ruse or trick that will only result in subsequent 
retaliation by government agencies against those who file and participate in this process? 

Most attorneys view the UCC fi-om the perspective of litigation and adjudication. However, the UCC is 
legislated (Administrative Law) that codifies the rules for all commercial transactions between countries, 
states and individuals. The courts acknowledge they do not have the authority or jurisdiction to amend, alter 
or nullify any of the Articles of the UCC. They can only consider "gray areas" such as: Who holds the 
priority position? The party that filed the UCC first or the one who perfected first? The courts have addressed 
and determine in specific situations what can be considered a "fixture" as it relates to real property under the 
UCC. 

When one files a UCC form and it is recorded by a state's UCC office, that filing becomes a legal document 
of public record identifying the filer as the Secured Party. Hence no court can lawfiilly rule on the fact or 
existence of the filing itself That filing is a legal fact. The employees of the UCC Department in each state 
are fiduciaries required to follow specific rules aiid procedures. If a UCC filing meets the specifications of 
those rules and procedures the document is to be recorded. There are minor variations in the UCC 
subsections from state to state and even country to country, but the bulk of the commercial rules and 
procedures are universal and uniform. Hence the designation Uniform Commercial Code. 

UCC filing offices are located in each state of the union, in each of the territories and protectorates of the 
U.S. as well as in many foreign countries. Filing a UCC form is an administrative action that, when accepted 
and recorded by the UCC office, is stamped with a file number, date, hour and even minute of filing. The 
UCC Financing Statement (UCC-I) details a Secured Party's status in any commercial transaction according 
to the Articles of the UCC as well as various section of the United States Code dealing with "Property." 
Once a Secured party's UCC form has been filed it is a fact in public record that there is a secured, vested 
interest therein holding a superior claim and all other parties at interest who file thereafter must 
acknowledge, accept and respect the Secured Party's superior and prior position. Any changes filed 
thereafter by the Secured Party can be accomplished by filing an Amendment (UCC-3) referencing the 
original UCC filing. However, the facts are clear. The UCC deals with secured, vested interest and/or 
possession, never title. Title is another subject altogether. 

1. Is the Birth Certificate itself a commercial instrument, a Promissory Note or other negotiable instrument of 
value? 

The answer is an emphatic NO! However, the authorization to prepare a Certificate of Live Birth is given in 
the form of an application signed by the parents and/or the doctor fliat is in form and substance a commercial 

1 - UCC/Redemption Update - 2004 



Casel:06-cv-01124-ESH Document 17-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 10 of 14 

contract. A local or state birth certificate is simply evidence that a commercial contract has been entered into 
making the newborn a ward of the "state." Within two weeks and three days the Certificate of Live Birth 
based on that application is delivered and filed in Washington, D.C/ Furthermore, it is a bonded instrument.' 
On the back of the document is a letter (A-N) followed by eight numbers. More recently issued Social 
Security Cards have a similar bond serial number stamped on the back. 

2. Is the Birth Certificate itself, originally prepared in the county of birth, a contract giving the state control 
over all aspects of the individual represented thereon? 

Again the answer is NO. A birth certificate is not a contract and has no value in and of itself except as 
evidence that a Certificate of Live Birth does exist. That Certificate is on file in the official records in 
Washington, D.C. and stands as incontrovertible evidence that there is a living, breathing man or woman 
whose existence has been registered with the state and with certain federal agencies. Records of foreign bom 
are on file with a Certificate of Naturalization, Citizenship or other document authorizing their residence 
here. Public agencies designate the name on the document as a "person." The value placed on the Certificate 
of Live Birth is based on the ability of the "state" to tax the future assets of that "Debtor." A bond is taken 
out by the Department of the Treasury and a bond # is stamped on the back of the Certificate of Live Birth. 
Printouts of some Individual Master Files (IMF) reveal that bond to be about $650,000. One IRS Master File 
I saw lists an ^RS- Treasury Bend 4n~th«- amount «f $742,-500 that the individual requester, knew, nothing 
about. However, all the profit generated by this investment between the birth and the death of the living, 
breathing man or wornan is kept by the "state." 

1933 was a pivotal year for the United States government and the American people. History reveals that it 
took only 20 years after 1913, the year the Federal Reserve Act was "approved" by Congress for the United 
States (Corporate) to slip into debt and insolvency. The International Bankers served Notice of this fact on 
the govemment. Between January and July of 1933 the Roosevelt Administration and Congress responded. 
Exactly how all this was orchestrated is too lengthy to be addressed here, but this fact is clear - since then the 
birth or naturalization record for every U.S. Citizen is on file in the official records in Washington, D.C. and 
the prpperty and assets of every living U.S. Citizen is pledged as collateral for the National Debt. 
Infomiation I have received from various govemment agencies indicates the filed Certificate of Live Birth 
documents themselves have specific instructions printed on the back stipulating by whom, to whom and in 
what time frame the document is to be created and delivered. First to the County Health Commissioner, 
followed by the Secretary of State and finally the Department of Commerce though the files are not 
maintained in their offices. Within two weeks and three days each Certificate of Live Birth is to be filed in 
D.C. Evidence reveals that there is even a Federal Children Department established by the 
Shepherd/Townsend Act of 1922 under the Department of Commerce that appears to be involved in this 
process in some way. 

1 have seen IMFs that list commercial activity in the $-billions assigned to individuals making around 
$50,000 per year! The govemment is using their name and assets to trade in drugs, cmde oil and other 
commodities. This is just another example in evidence that all property, real and personal of every living 
American, is committed by Congress to back the National Debt. In 1933 Congress turned over control of all 
the post offices in D.C. to the Secretary of the Treasury. Why? 

That is how the money comes in especially around April 15! Read the 1933 Congressional record you will 
realize that the office of the Secretary of the Treasury is actually the keeper in the financial office of the 
United States (Corporate) to control the flow of all income to the U.S. so that the Creditor, the bankers who 
own the Federal Reserve, will receive their money. The salary of the Secretary, John W. Sno\v, is paid by the 
International Monetary Fund. "He who pays the piper calls the tune." 

According to government sources, well over twenty-five million UCC financing statements have been filed 
with UCC offices in many states. Corresponding commercial paperwork has been sent to the Secretary of the 
Treasury, These facts have been compiled through information obtained from the CID of the IRS, FBI, 

2 - UCC/Redemption Update - 2004 



Case1:06-cv-01124-ESH Document 17-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 11 of 14 

Secret Service, Justice s^epartment, the Department of the Treasury and the Secretary of State. By their own 
admission not one properly filed UCC form has been rejected or criminally prosecuted. 

However, the revised UCC Articles, especially IX (effective July 1 , 200 1) imply that the UCC 
Financing Statement of the Secured Party applicant must be filed in the birth state or UCC 
Region. That recorded filing must then be included with a Charge-Back Instruction Notice a 
1 040 ES form and a birth certificate with the Secretary of the Treasury. The Secretary is the other 

Party at Interest. Thirdly, the Secured Party needs to file a UCC Financing Statement and 
Addendum with the UCC office in the "resident" state to protect assets there. 

Employees at the Department of the Treasury and the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS where the 
files are kept make it clear the birth certificate has no commercial value. However, government agents 
acknowledge that the Certificates of Live Birth do exist and are on file. Some have even admitted that the 
Application for the Birth Certificate does have commercial value based on the ability of government to tax 
the future earnings of the person represented by those documents. However, the applications are not on file in 
D.C. Research indicates they may well be either in Puerto Rico or Switzerland. 

The states, protectorates and D.C. have formed a National UCC Administration. They have partitioned the 
United States into six UCC Regions. If one UCC office within that region is not willing to accept for filing a 
properly worded UCC Financing Statement another UCC in that region will. One can record a regional filing 
m a, UCC region state that is the same as filing in their birth state. If one is bom outside the U.S., but is 
authorized to live here and hold a Social Security Card, they can file the UCC form in the state or region 
where they resided when they received such authorization. 

Specifically, research reveals that the UCC and other required paperwork filed with the birth state or region 
is logge(l in at the mailroom - 1500 Pennsylvania NW, Washington, D.C. This is the address of legal service 
for thepecretary of the Treasury. According to LaTanya Y. Wilson all UCC and Bill of Exchange documents 
are routed to the IRS - Room 1120, 1111 Constitution Ave - NW, Washington, D.C. 20224 under the 
administration of Felix Zech. This is the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS. These documents are 
scrutinized by the Secret Service, the FBI and Justice Department. Dolores Douglas at the Analysis and 
Control Division has stated that these are designated as "UCC Contract Trusts." 

The UCC Contract Trusts are distinct and separate from Direct Treasury Accounts used exclusively for 
trading in Treasury Bonds that are administered by the Bureau of Public Debt. I have learned that many of 
the UCC and Bill of Exchange documents received at 1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW are misdirected to the 
BPD. One major error is that many filers reference a Treasury Direct or Direct Treasury account in their 
documents. 

At the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS Building in D.C. UCC Contract Trusts are processed and the 
paperwork is then routed to one of two IRS Centers. For east of the Mississippi they are routed to Cincinnati, 
Ohio. West of the River they are sent to Fresno, California. I have since learned that Notices discharging IRS 
claims east of the Mississippi are also to be sent to Joseph Kehoe - CSB/SPF of the IRS in D.C. West of the 
River they are to be sent to Gary Sterr - WRM/SPF - Seattle, Washington. 

Current reports indicate the UCC files and paperwork is scrutinized by the Secret Service, the 
Justice Department, FBI, routed to the CID, then to the IRS Technical Support Division (TSD) in 

the state from where the Secured Party initiated the discharge. A December 2002 memo from 
LaTanya Wilson notes that copies of these documents are also forwarded to Jeanean West at the 
Department of Justice, Tax Division in D.C. 

Here are some important details regarding the administration and function of the TSD: 

a. Almost every financial institution connected with the Federal Reserve System has in its register or has 

contracted access to an IRS account known as a Treasury Tax and I^oan account (TTL). 

3 - UCC/Redemption Update - 2004 



Case 1 :06-cv-01 1 24-ESH Document 1 7-3 Filed 1 1 /1 6/2006 Page 1 2 of 1 4 

b. The TTL account in each financial institution is administered from the TSD office located in most state 
offices of the IRS. As a result of IRS internal reorganization the Technical Support Manager (TSM) in each 
State Divisional Office of the IRS has been assigned the authority formerly assigned to the District Director. 

c. When a "NOTICE of Levy/Lien is presented to any financial institution by the IRS (usually by fax) the 
financial institution usually responds routinely by making a simple entry in their computer transferring the 
asset from the depositor's account to the IRS TTL account. THE ASSET DOES NOT PHYSICALLY 
LEAVE THEIR OFFICE. A few financial institutions do not have TTL accounts. They place a 21 day hold 

on thefiinds and then forward the amount demanded directly to the IRS. / 

d. When a "Release of Levy/Lien" is issued by the IRS the financial institution makes an entry in the I 
computer and transfers funds from the TTL account to the depositor's account if applicable; 

A properly prepared and filed UCC form on file with the bank can be an administrative preventative action a 
Secured Party can take to document prior, superior claim to those assets on deposit. See United Tobacco 
Warehouse vs. Wells (1973) and Diversified Metal Products vs. T-Bow Company Trust, IRS, et at (1993). , ( 

Some banks will not accept UCC documents. Deposit the funds in a financial institution that will. 

Discharging claims in the public sector and with the IRS through the UCC Contract Trust can be , 

accomplished by the Secured Party with presentment of Bonded Registered Bill of Exchange directly to the 
Seeretaiy ef-tihe Treasury.- Whcn-anassessment-(elaim-)4sinade43ythe-IRS, a federal «r state taxing-agency, 
the claim can be stamped "Accepted For Value" by the Secured Party and sent via Certified (or Registered) 
Mail to the Secretary of the Treasury for discharge. This action is documented and authorized through Public | 

Policy HJR-192, Title IV, Sec. 401 of the Federal Reserve Act, the Supreme Court's confirmation m ' 

Guaranty Trust of New York vs. Henwood, et al (1939) and Public Law 73-10. Such action is fiirther 
confirmed in USC Title Xn, Title XXVIH, Sec. 1 64 1 , 3002 and the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act. 

Regarding the alleged commercial value of the birth certificate the following facts are clear: 

• Hundreds of thousands birth certificates referenced in UCC Financing Statements have been filed and 
stamped by numerous state UCC filing offices. Under the revised Article (Chapter) DC of the UCC (July 1, 

2001) such filers had until June 30, 2002 to re file the UCC-1 with their birth state. By referencing their l 

original filing they could protect the earlier filing date that, then, would be filed with the Secretary of the j 

Treasury. Failure to do so, however, by July 1, 2002 would result in losing their original filing date and their 
status as the Secured Party with the Secretary of the Treasury. < 

• The Department of the Treasury acknowledges that UCC filings by millions of Secured Parties have been 
routed to the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS in D.C. Not one, to my knowledge has been 
criminally prosecuted. We have been told that many are in Hmbo because the files are not complete. 

• Thousands of discharge documents have been presented to the Secretary of the Treasury, routed to the 
Analysis and Control Division of the IRS for processing and not one has been criminally prosecuted. 

All of the foregoing reveals that those who have properly filed UCC documents in the Redemption Process I 

have not committed any crime according to the Department of the Treasury, thie Secret Service, the ' 

Department of Justice and the IRS. 

3. Does tiie filing of UCC Financing statements and Change/Amendments encompass all commercial, civil 
and even criminal actions? 

According to numerous government sources all commercial transactions in the U.S. and many other I 

countries come under the Legislated (Administrative) Law known as the Uniform Commercial Code. These j 

transactions all become "bonded" when they are processed through the Federal Reserve System and/or the 
Department of the Treasury. The courts do claim jurisdiction for commercial transactions that appear 
criminal. The UCC Articles themselves are Administrative Law and not subject to the jurisdiction of the 
courts and litigation. 

Over the past number of years I have had contact with those who have stated they have received proof from 
Department of Commerce documents that their Certificates of Live Birth are being used as commercial 
instruments. A detailed investigation by Carl Erickson has revealed some startling facts in this regard. When 

4 - UCC/Redemption Update - 2004 



Case 1 :06-cv-01 1 24-ESH Document 1 7-3 Filed 1 1 /1 6/2006 Page 1 3 of 1 4 

the Application and Certificate of Live Birth arrives at the Department of the Treasury in Washington, D.C. 
the Certificate is bonded, an account is set up with what we know as the Social Security Number, funds are 
borrowed. The paper credit is invested in stocks and bonds. According to the Bureau of Engraving even 
Federal Reserve Notes are printed bearing the Bond Number that is assigned to and stamped on the back of 
each Certificate of Live Birth. The Bond Number consists of a letter (A-NO followed by eight numbers. A 
similar combination is now routinely printed on the back of Social Security Cards. The fact is that the very 
existence of every living, breathing man or woman in the Several states is bonded and used for the 
commercial activities of the United States (Corporate) now in receivership. 

Those who properly file in their birth state or UCC Region establish the distinct and separate identity 
of the Secured Party apart from the Debtor (Strawman). Presenting that filing along with the 
Instruction Order (Chargeback), the ERS 1040 £S form, the AFV stamped birth certificate notifies the 
Secretary of the Treasury that the Secured Party is now established with a prior, superior claim on all 
assets and liabilities of the Debtor. The liabilities can then be presented to the Secretary for processing 
and discharge through the UCC Contract Trust. 

An increasing number of states now accept the UCC Financing Statement and Addendum. To my knowledge 
not one state has prosecuted any such filing as unlawful, illegal or criminal. Many states are still digesting 
the revised UCC Code (July 1, 2001) and many counties still do not have provision for perfecting the UCC 
filing under Article 9-333(a) as a Possessory Lien. The inclusion of 9-333(a) is the first time a form of Hen 
by name has been included in the UCC. 

4. Is following the Redemption Process simply an attempt to get something for nothing through the Secretary 
of the Treasury? 

In June 1933 the Intemaitional Bankers, owners of the Federal Reserve, essentially took control of all private 
and real property with the consent of Congress and Executive Orders of the President. Establishing status as 
the Secured Party for the entity represented by the Certificate of Live Birth does not constitute getting 
"something for nothing." These procedures set up by the government were put in place so that the Secured 
Party could reclaim a part of what is rightfully theirs under the U.S. Constitution. Congress made provision 
beginning in the early 1900s for every minor to reinstate their status as an American under the U.S. 
Constitution when they became of age. You were a minor when the original contract (Application) was 
entered into by your parents. These provisions were scattered throughout various legislative acts, joint 
resolutions and executive orders, many in 1933, as well as in the Congressional Record based on Public 
Policy HJR-192, codified in Public Law 73-10 and confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1939. See 
Guarantee Trust of New York v. Henwood, et al (FN3). By these placement actions the Administration and 
Congress basically kept the details obscured so no one could readily avail himself of such remedy. Very few 
were even aware such procedures existed until fairly recently. The UCC filing with the birth/UCC Regional, 
the Secretary of the Treasury, and resident state is an essential part of the Redemption Process. The MF 
through their representative, the Secretary of the Treasury, with the use of the Federal Reserve and collection 
activity of the IRS virtually controls all assets of every U.S. Citizen. With the UCC/Redemption the Secured 
Party establishes the right to begin reversing that absolute control over the Debtor (Strawman), The Secured 
Party establishes level ground with the Secretary of the treasury taking back a measure of control of those 
assets. 

However, UCC filings, properly prepared and correctly filed, go much further in protecting the property and 
interests of the Secured Party. Such filings can clearly secure legal vested interest control of the Secured 
Party without the complex jurisdiction of the courts and apart from the arena of controversy. 

5. Is the Redemption Process (Plan) simply a "get rich quick" ruse or trick that will only result in retaliation 
by the government against those who follow it? 

The Secured Party under the UCC/Redemption Process does not hold the actual Application for a Certificate 
of Live Birth. Therefore, the process can only be used as an "Accepted For Value" response to a commercial 
claim. A written, contracted, acknowledged claim received by the Debtor (Strawman) can be Accepted For 
Value by the Secured Party and discharged when properly presented through the Secretary of the Treasury to 

5 - UCC/Redemption Update - 2004 



. Case1.:06-cv-01124-ESH Document 17-3 Filed 11/16/2006 Page14of14 

the UCC Contract Trust on file with the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS. Unfortunately, many have 
attempted to circumvent or distort this fact only to find law enforcement and the courts more than willing to 
enforce and adjudicate. IRS-GID and FBI are often quick to use their intimidation and threat to unlawfully' 
discourage what the courts of law only should handle. 

Employees at the Department of the Treasury make it clear they do not accept or act upon faxed orders, 
telephoned or wired instructions. Hard copy, original in-signature forms and documents must be presented 
via Certified (or registered) mail as filed with both the state and the Secretary of the Treasury. In 2002, 
before his resignation, Mr. Paul H. O'Neill made it clear to a Senator from Arkansas that when he is aware of 
and receives Bill of Exchange documents, he holds them, thus honoring them. 

The IRS has recently increased its unlawful use of threats and intimidation with the help of the FBI to 
discourage and stop the presentment of all Bill of Exchange documents by the Secured party to the Secretaiy. 
However, properly prepared and presented negotiable instruments fi-om a legitimate Secured Party can be 
lawfully and legally processed through local financial institutions by the claimant through the Secretary of 
the Treasury and ledgered by the financial institution through the Treasury Tax and Loan (TTL) account. 
However, certain employees at the Department of the Treasury persist in misrouting many of the documents 
presented by a Secured Party to the Secretary of the Treasury by labeling them as Treasury Securities (which 
they are not) then sending them to the Bureau of Public Debt instead of to the Analysis and Control Division 
ofthe IRS and the UCC Contract Trust. - 

As far as I have been able to determine discharge of claims in the public sector, federal and state, initiated by 
the IRS are discharged with a simple ledger entry and computer transfer for credit and debit through the IRS 
Technical Support Division. Further confirmation regarding this process has come from the Special 
Procedure Handling Offices ofthe IRS. 

Barton A. Buhtz 

c/o 8050 Le Berthon St 

Sunland, California [91040] 

eclok@juno.com 



6 - UCC/Redemption Update - 2004